Our Approach

Cybersecurity programmes are often evaluated through internal metrics, control frameworks and reports generated by the same teams and providers responsible for delivering them. These inputs are valuable, but they do not always reveal how an attacker would view the organisation.

An adversary does not assess controls individually. They look for combinations of weakness: a trusted relationship, an exposed identity, a process gap, an overlooked system or a decision made under pressure.

Rath Meridian applies that perspective at an executive level. We consider how material business harm could occur, which assumptions would need to fail and whether the organisation could detect, contain and recover from a serious attack.